Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinrauch, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Matejka, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 11, No. 1, 31-37 (1973)
DOI: 10.1177/002194367301100104
© 1973 Association for Business Communication

Are Student Ratings of Business Communication Teachers Honest Feedback?

J. Donald Weinrauch

Indiana University at South Bend

J. Kenneth Matejka

University of Arkansas

This article examines the question of student honesty in student ratings of a business communication instructor. The tested hypothesis was that the expected grade would not have a significant bearing on the evaluation of the instructor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
R. M. Davis
A Research Proposal
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 1974; 12(1): 45 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]