Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulhavy, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 18, No. 1, 17-24 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/002194368101800103
© 1981 Association for Business Communication

Tone of Communication and Climate Perceptions

Raymond W. Kulhavy

Arizona State University

Neil H. Schwartz

Arizona State University

Participants read a standard orienting statement describing the founding, current business, and policies of a fictitious corporation. Half of the read ers studied the original statement, which was written in terms of a "flexi ble" approach to organizational structure. The remaining half of the sample read a modified version in which three percent of the original words had been changed toward a "strict" tone of communication. After reading, both groups rated the organization in terms of how they perceived its atti tude toward social responsibility, labor relations, and personal values. The three-percent wording change toward the strict climate significantly influ enced the amount of negative ratings, with people in the strict wording group consistently seeing the organization's climate as less pleasant and more restrictive. These results indicate that management should take great care in structuring even the most general communications since very small changes in wording can lead to substantial shifts in attitude about the organization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?