Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yates, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 22, No. 1, 5-33 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/002194368502200101
© 1985 Association for Business Communication

Graphs as a Managerial Tool: A Case Study of Du Pont's Use of Graphs in the Early Twentieth Century

JoAnne Yates

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This article examines the development of graphs and charts as managerial tools at the beginning of the twentieth century, using Du Pont as a case study The evolution of graphic business tools was a result of two things. I) business's need for methods of analyzing and communicating data rapidly in the years of business growth and development at the beginning of the century, and 2) a growing general understanding of the capabilities of graphs Du Pont's chart room, developed less than twenty years after graphs were first introduced into the company, succeeded spectacularly in suiting the graphic medium to the company's executive needs as it developed from one organizational structure to another. This case study provides some lessons for managers and teachers of business communication today.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
A. N. Shelby and N. L. Reinsch Jr.
Writing in Noninterpersonal Settings: Rhetorical Choices by Nonprofessional Writers in Letters to a Senator
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 50 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
M. Mascolini
Another Look at Teaching the External Negative Message
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1994; 57(2): 45 - 47.
[PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
N. R. Blyler
Teaching Purpose in a Business Communication Course
Business Communication Quarterly, September 1, 1993; 56(3): 15 - 20.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
B. F. BARTON and M. S. BARTON
Modes of Power in Technical and Professional Visuals
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1993; 7(1): 138 - 162.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
C. THRALLS
Rites and Ceremonials: Corporate Video and the Construction of Social Realities in Modern Organizations
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 1992; 6(4): 381 - 402.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
P. R. Johnson and J. Indvik
Integration Theory: Developing Effective "Bad News" Messages
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 55(3): 57 - 58.
[PDF]