Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clampitt, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hartel, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 23, No. 3, 5-17 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/002194368602300301
© 1986 Association for Business Communication

Exploratory Research on Employee Publications

Phillip G. Clampitt

University of Wisconsin—Green Bay

Jean M. Crevcoure

University of Wisconsin—Green Bay

Robin L. Hartel

University of Wisconsin—Green Bay

Employee publications are used extensively in organizations, but relatively little research has been conducted on the nature and impact of these unique communication tools. This rationale provided the impetus for this research project, which involved analyzing the results of a questionnaire sent to the editors of300 employee publications . Respondents were also asked to include a copy of their employee publication and 53 editors did so. The basic analysis consisted of examining the survey responses and critically analyzing the actual publications. A theoretical orientation to the unique dynamics faced by editors is presented and five basic conclusions were reached in the study. First, the results of this study were similar to past research on the characteristics of the "typical publication." Second, there appears to be some congruency between the stated purpose and the type of articles actually contained in the publications. Third, there was little evidence that employee publications were formally evaluated. Fourth, the major purpose and focus of employee publications appears to be employee recognition. Fifth, the evidence suggests that many editors appear to be leaning towards the "trivialization" strategy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?