|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 27, No. 1,
25-36 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369002700103
A Factor Analysis of Barriers to Effective Listening
Steven Golen
Arizona State University
This study examined the most frequently encountered barriers that may affect listen ing effectiveness among business college students. A factor analysis indicated the presence of six listening barrier factors that concern students. In addition, the barrier "listen primarily for details or facts" was perceived to be the most frequently en countered barrier identifded by the students. The students' major or age had no bear ing on the level of frequency given to the barrier factors. However, two out of the six factors were significantly different based on the students'sex.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Pillemer, J. J. Suitor, C. R. Henderson, Jr., R. Meador, L. Schultz, J. Robison, and C. Hegeman
A Cooperative Communication Intervention for Nursing Home Staff and Family Members of Residents
Gerontologist,
April 1, 2003;
43(90002):
96 - 106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Pearce, I. W. Johnson, and R. T. Barker
Assessment of the Listening Styles Inventory: Progress in Establishing Reliability and Validity
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
January 1, 2003;
17(1):
84 - 113.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Goby and J. H. Lewis
The Key Role of Listening in Business: A Study of the Singapore Insurance Industry
Business Communication Quarterly,
January 1, 2000;
63(2):
41 - 51.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Brownell
Preparing Students for Multicultural Environments: Listening as a Key Management Competency
Journal of Management Education,
December 1, 1992;
16(4_suppl):
81 - 93.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. BARKER, C. G. PEARCE, and I. W. JOHNSON
An Investigation of Perceived Managerial Listening Ability
Journal of Business and Technical Communication,
October 1, 1992;
6(4):
438 - 457.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|