Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Notarantonio, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 27, No. 2, 171-184 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369002700204
© 1990 Association for Business Communication

The Effects of Open and Dominant Communication Styles on Perceptions of the Sales Interaction

Elaine M. Notarantonio

Bryant College

Jerry L. Cohen

Universify of Rhode Island

The effect of the Open and Dominant communication styles from Norton's (1978) dimensions were tested on judgments and perceptions of sales effectiveness. Eighty stu dents in small groups viewed pretested videotapes of a sales interaction; each tape depicted one of the four combinations of communicator style dimensions (high and low levels of Openness and Dominance). After viewing the tape, subjects completed a 42- item questionnaire from which six composite scores were created. Using a 2 x 2 ANOVA design, four of these composites showed significant effects: (1) Perceptions of the product being sold, (2) the interaction between the salesperson and customer in the tape, (3) Probability of purchase of the product in the tape and (4) Perceptions of the salesperson being depicted in the tape. Respondents, in general, rated the high Dominant /low Open and low Dominant /high Open salesperson more favorably than the high Dominant / high Open or Low Dominant /low Open salesperson. These results are addressed in terms of the sales interaction and as a heuristic for future research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?