Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 27, No. 4, 331-355 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369002700402
© 1990 Association for Business Communication

Process, Organizational, Relational, and Personal Determinants of Managerial Compliance-gaining Communication Strategies

Jeremiah J. Sullivan

University of Washington

Terrance L. Albrecht

University of Washington

Sully Taylor

University of Washington

Superior compliance-gaining strategies, subordinate resistance, and superior follow- up strategies were studied in a survey of 176 superior-key subordinate dyads repre senting a wide spectrum of organizations, positions, and hierarchical relationships. Results suggest that process variables (the types of resistance offered by subordinates) are the most important influence on managerial choice of compliance messages. Reasoning was the most frequently employed strategy, and its use was associated with high levels of formalization in organizations. Power was an important influence only on the use of assertiveness, probably because high power over subordinates lowers the costs of using assertiveness so that benefits of use outweigh costs. Other variables had little impact. The findings support a functional rather than a "causal" model of com pliance message selection in organizations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
S. Taylor and J. Sullivan
Communication Practices of Japanese Managers in America: Cultural vs Functional Theories
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, September 1, 1993; 31(1): 33 - 45.
[PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. Sullivan and S. Taylor
A Cross-Cultural Test of Compliance-Gaining Theory
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1991; 5(2): 220 - 239.
[Abstract]