Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wedell, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allerheiligen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 28, No. 2, 131-140 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369102800204

Computer Assisted Writing Instruction: Is It Effective?

Allen J. Wedell

Colorado State University

Robert Allerheiligen

Colorado State University

Educators have been attempting for several years to improve student communication skills through the use of computer-assisted instruction (CAI). While numerous studies have attempted to measure the effects of using CAI, results have been inconsistent and inconclusive. Most studies reveal that both students and faculty possess a positive feel ing toward CAI but that students do not experience significant improvement in writing as a result of using Writer's Workbench.

This experimental study focused on student groups that used Writer's Workbench, considered the grandfather of all text analysis programs, and found that business stu dents do not perceive a significant improvement in writing after using Writer's Workbench. Students who used Writer's Workbench did, however, perceive significant improvement in their oral communication skills.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
G. F. KOHUT and K. J. GORMAN
The Effectiveness of Leading Grammar/Style Software Packages in Analyzing Business Students' Writing
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 1995; 9(3): 341 - 361.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
N. L. REINSCH JR. and R. W. BESWICK
Preferences for Sending Word-Processed versus Handwritten Messages: An Exploratory Study
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1995; 9(1): 42 - 62.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. C. Sherblom, C. F. Sullivan, and E. C. Sherblom
The What, the Whom, and the Hows of Survey Research
Business Communication Quarterly, December 1, 1993; 56(4): 58 - 64.
[PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
G. H. Vogt and S. Zelman
Customizing Word Processing Manuals for Business Writing Instruction
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 55(4): 37 - 40.
[PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
A. Williams and D. Ross
The Status of Business Communication and Technology: A Bibliography
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 55(4): 45 - 47.
[PDF]