Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearce, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Barker, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 28, No. 2, 141-151 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369102800205
© 1991 Association for Business Communication

A Comparison of Business Communication Quality between Computer Written and Handwritten Samples

C. Glenn Pearce

Virginia Commonwealth University

Randolph T. Barker

Virginia Commonwealth University

The present study compared handwritten reports with those written on computers for ten precisely defined quality factors. Reports written under both conditions by 160 upper division college students in a business communication course were submitted to the Grammatik II program for quality analysis and the results were subsequently analyzed for significant differences using ANOVA. More similarities than differences were found as six of the ten tests did not show significant differences. The findings of the study do not support a general conclusion that basic writing quality will improve when documents are written by computer as compared to writing them by hand. The importance of the present findings as they relate to earlier research and future re search directions are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
N. L. REINSCH JR. and R. W. BESWICK
Preferences for Sending Word-Processed versus Handwritten Messages: An Exploratory Study
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1995; 9(1): 42 - 62.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
A. Williams and D. Ross
The Status of Business Communication and Technology: A Bibliography
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 55(4): 45 - 47.
[PDF]