Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 31, No. 1, 41-60 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369403100103
© 1994 Association for Business Communication

Collaborative Planning and Transforming Knowledge

David L. Wallace

Iowa State University

Previous research suggests that although college students are developmentally ready to transform knowledge according to the constraints of specific rhetorical situations, they often don't do so. In this exploratory study, I ask if students in a business and professional writing course can transform knowledge when cued to do so in an invention activity—collaborative planning sessions—but are given no other instruc tional help. Further, I ask what kinds of instructional scaffolding students provide for each other in their planning sessions.

Collaborative planning sessions for two pairs of students on three different business writing assignments were recorded and transcribed. Detailed descriptive analyses of these transcripts suggest that the students transformed knowledge when they faced rhetorically complex tasks, when the writer showed commitment to the topic, when they engaged in extended discussion, and when they focused on rhetori cal issues. Further, the students provided each other with both relatively simple instructional scaffolds (active listening, identification of simple problems, and providing opportunities for extended elaboration) and more sophisticated, situation-specific prompts to transform knowledge (posing specific questions based on explicit rhetorical concerns and challenging each other to completely reconsider how they were approaching a writing task). Implications for pedagogy and research are briefly considered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
J. Jones
Patterns of Revision in Online Writing: A Study of Wikipedia's Featured Articles
Written Communication, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 262 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
E. Sanders Lopez and E. Nagelhout
Building a Model for Distance Collaboration in the Computer-Assisted Business Communication Classroom
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1995; 58(2): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]