Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 32, No. 1, 49-64 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369503200103
© 1995 Association for Business Communication

Preferences for Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication Tasks

Christopher B. Sullivan

Florida State University, Tallahassee

This study explains preferences among staff members of a state legislature for the interactive telecommunication technology of electronic mail. A survey comparing preferences for face-to-face, telephone, written and electronic mail communication channels found that preferences were significantly related to the type of communi cation task undertaken and that in some instances electronic mail was preferred over either the telephone or face-to-face communication.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
G. F. Thomas, C. L. King, B. Baroni, L. Cook, M. Keitelman, S. Miller, and A. Wardle
Reconceptualizing E-Mail Overload
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 1, 2006; 20(3): 252 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
D. D. Dawley and W. P. Anthony
User Perceptions of E-Mail at Work
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, April 1, 2003; 17(2): 170 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
K. L. Hacker, B. Goss, C. Townley, and V. J. Horton
Employee Attitudes Regarding Electronic Mail Policies: A Case Study
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 1998; 11(3): 422 - 452.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
B. McPherson
Student Perceptions About Business Communication in Their Careers
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1998; 61(2): 68 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
J. M. Gotcher and E. W. Kanervo
Perceptions and Uses of Electronic Mail: A Function of Rhetorical Style
Social Science Computer Review, July 1, 1997; 15(2): 145 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
P. A. Merrier and R. Dirks
Student Attitudes Toward Written, Oral, and E-mail Communication
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1997; 60(2): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]