Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suchan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 32, No. 1, 7-29 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369503200101

The Influence of Organizational Metaphors on Writers' Communication Roles and Stylistic Choices

Jim Suchan

The Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California

This study examines the influence that organizational metaphors have on report writers' framing of their writing tasks and the stylistic, organizational, and document design choices they make. The study, conducted at a medium-size organi zation, uses participant observation, semi-structured individual and group inter views, and protocol analysis to gather data from 23 staff professionals at three field sites.

The data show that writers see themselves as communication ciphers or con duits and describe their communication activities in mechanistic terms. These metaphors, which complemented the organization's view of itself as a smoothly operating machine, help explain why writers were neither aware of nor concerned about their report readers and why they write difficult-to-read reports.

These results indicate that root organizational metaphors significantly influence writers'perception of their communication role and the rhetorical choices they make. Altering these writers' composing habits would be a major intervention requiring a change in the organization's dominant or root metaphor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
J. Suchan
Changing Organizational Communication Practices and Norms: A Framework
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 5 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
J. E. Lease, R. V. McConnell, and M. Nord
Discourse as A Catalyst for Change in Management Education
Journal of Management Education, April 1, 1999; 23(2): 154 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
C. DAVID and M. B. GRAHAM
Conflicting Values: Team Management Portrayed in Epic Metaphors
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1997; 11(1): 24 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]