Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dale Meyer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 32, No. 4, 383-399 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369503200405
© 1995 Association for Business Communication

Reviews

Qualitative Research in Business Communication: A Review and Analysis

Mary L. Tucker

Colorado State University

Karen Sterkel Powell

Colorado State University

G. Dale Meyer

University of Colorado at Boulder

Communication researchers, concerned with gathering complete, valid, and reproducible results, are being encouraged to use a group of qualitative research methods for studying business communication. The question that intuitively arises, then, is whether qualitative methods are increasingly utilized in pub lished business communication research. This paper addresses the call for qualitative research in business communication, describes qualitative research methods with examples of business communication articles in which qualitative and qualitative/quantitative methods were used effectively, and presents an analysis of research methods used in articles published in three business com munication journals during the last four years. The paper concludes with recommendations for business communication research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
M. B. Graham
Disciplinary Practice(s) in Business Communication, 1985 to 2004
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2006; 43(3): 268 - 277.
[PDF]