Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varona, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 33, No. 2, 111-140 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369603300203

Relationship Between Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Three Guatemalan Organizations

Federico Varona

San Jose State University

The main purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between organi zational communication satisfaction and organizational commitment in three Guatemalan organizations. Data were collected using three questionnaires: the Downs's (1990) Communication Audit Questionnaire (CAQ), the Mowday, Porter, and Steers's (1979) Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ), and the Cook and Wall's (1980) Organizational Commitment Instrument (OCI). Results indicated that, first, there was an explicit positive relationship between communication satisfaction and employees' organizational commitment. Sec ond, school teachers were significantly more satisfied with the communication practices and more committed to their organization than were the employees of the other two organizations (a hospital and a food factory). Third, supervisors were significantly more satisfied than were subordinates with overall communi cation practices. Fourth, employees with more tenure were significantly more committed to their organizations. Fifth, the three-factor solution for the Cook and Wall's Organizational Commitment Instrument did not emerge in this sample as theorized by its authors. A two-factor solution for the Mowday, Porter, and Steers's Organizational Commitment Questionnaire emerged as appropriate for the Guatemalan sample. Finally, conflicting findings in the internal reliabil ity and factor analysis of one of the commitment instruments used in this study conducted in Guatemala and in studies conducted in the United States raise several important issues on the use of research instruments in cross-cultural studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
K. Zwijze-Koning and M. de Jong
Evaluating the Communication Satisfaction Questionnaire as a Communication Audit Tool
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2007; 20(3): 261 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
B. H. Mueller and J. Lee
Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Communication Satisfaction in Multiple Contexts
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2002; 39(2): 220 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]