Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faris, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Smeltzer, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 34, No. 1, 7-26 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369703400101
© 1997 Association for Business Communication

Schema Theory Compared to Text-Centered Theory as an Explanation for the Readers' Understanding of a Business Message

Kay A. Faris

Arizona State University

Larry R. Smeltzer

Arizona State University

To better understand what variables affect reader understanding of business writing, schema theory was compared to text-centered theory. Levels of readers' knowledge represented schema theory while message coherence represented text- centered theory. Newly developed instruments measured background knowledge and reader understanding. Text reading material was also developed. The research design consisted of a 2 x 2 factorial with business and nonbusiness subjects. The primary conclusion is that background knowledge (schema theory) affected a reader's ability to understand business communication. However, coherence (text-centered theory) did not affect understanding. Because coherence is only one textual quality, this study demonstrates the importance of additional research on the variables that affect reader understanding.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?