This Article Order Full text via Infotrieve References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bordia, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature

University of Queensland

This paper synthesizes the findings of published experimental studies (n = 18) that compared face-to-face (FTF) and computer-mediated communication (CMC). The literature is pulled together by way of ten propositions, each pre sented with the supporting evidence. In general, discussions on CMC take longer, produce more ideas, and have greater equality of participation. There is reduced normative pressure and poorer comprehension of the discussion in CMC. Findings regarding quality of performance, uninhibited behavior, choice shift, attitude change, and evaluation of communication partner are not defini tive. Factors limiting the internal and external validity of these studies are also discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. E. Fox, M. Morris, and N. Rumsey Doing Synchronous Online Focus Groups With Young People: Methodological Reflections Qual Health Res, April 1, 2007; 17(4): 539 - 547. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Krebs, E. V. Hobman, and P. Bordia Virtual Teams and Group Member Dissimilarity: Consequences for the Development of Trust Small Group Research, December 1, 2006; 37(6): 721 - 741. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. W. Turner, R. J. Thomas, and N. L. Reinsch Jr. Willingness to Try a New Communication Technology: Perceptual Factors and Task Situations in a Health Care Context Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 5 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Underhill and M. G. Olmsted An Experimental Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Focus Groups Social Science Computer Review, November 1, 2003; 21(4): 506 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Dorado, F. J. Medina, L. Munduate, I. F. J. Cisneros, and M. Euwema Computer-Mediated Negotiation of an Escalated Conflict Small Group Research, October 1, 2002; 33(5): 509 - 524. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. V. Hobman, P. Bordia, B. Irmer, and A. Chang The Expression of Conflict in Computer-Mediated and Face-To-Face Groups Small Group Research, August 1, 2002; 33(4): 439 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Bordia, N. Difonzo, and A. Chang Rumor as Group Problem Solving: Development Patterns in Informal Computer-Mediated Groups Small Group Research, February 1, 1999; 30(1): 8 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. V. HEMBY Predicting Computer Anxiety in the Business Communication Classroom: Facts, Figures, and Teaching Strategies Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1998; 12(1): 89 - 108. [Abstract]