Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Business Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courtis, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Corporate Annual Report Graphical Communication in Hong Kong: Effective or Misleading?

John K. Courtis

City Uniuersity of Hong Kong

Graphical presentation of quantitative data within corporate annual reports has become one of the techniques used by management to disclose quantitative information. The purposes of the paper are (a) to review the normative advan tages and limitations of graphs in corporate reporting, and (b) to extend our knowledge about the presentation of annual report chart graphics by examining Asian (Hong Kong) data. Two surveys of chart graphics were undertaken: 140 annual reports for 1992-1993 and 114 for 1994-1995. It was found that 38% and 35% of companies respectively for each of the two time periods include chart graphics. However, the second survey found the surprising and disturbing result that the construction techniques used in approximately half of all graphs violate sound principles and are therefore misleading. Because misleading graphs occur across all industrial sectors, violations may be the result of preparer ignorance and carelessness rather than wilful manipulation to deceive. Without objective evidence about this, professional management and accountancy organizations probably need not yet draft construction guidelines for annual report preparers.

Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 34, No. 3, 269-284 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369703400304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
R. Deumes
Corporate Risk Reporting: A Content Analysis of Narrative Risk Disclosures in Prospectuses
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 120 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. M. Penrose
Annual Report Graphic Use: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 158 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
V. Beattie, A. Dhanani, and M. J. Jones
Investigating Presentational Change in U.K. Annual Reports: A Longitudinal Perspective
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 181 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
R. N. Conaway and W. J. Wardrope
Communication in Latin America: An Analysis of Guatemalan Business Letters
Business Communication Quarterly, December 1, 2004; 67(4): 465 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
B. Stevens
Russian Teaching Contracts: An Examination of Cultural Influence and Genre
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 38 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]