Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renkema, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hoeken, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 35, No. 4, 521-535 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369803500405
© 1998 Association for Business Communication

News

The Influence of Negative Newspaper Publicity on Corporate Image in the Netherlands

Jan Renkema

Tilburg University, The Netherlands

Hans Hoeken

University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Due to a new press policy, the Dutch equivalent of the District Attorney's office actively spreads information about its suspicions of illegal behavior. Newspa pers, which are still a dominant form of news in the Netherlands, publish these suspicions. This will probably harm the suspected person's or company's image. This study addresses three questions. First, how severe is the damage caused by negative publicity in a Dutch regional daily? Second, are Dutch newspaper readers sensitive to the tone of certainty with which the accusations are expressed? Third, how lasting are any of these effects? In a field experiment, 448 readers of regional dailies, differing widely in age and education level, read either an actually published newspaper article on a possible bribery scandal, a more objective rewrite of this article, or some neutral information on the com pany s activities. Results show that the corporate image was seriously damaged by negative publicity. The more categorical the accusations were, the more damage there was. More than two weeks after reading the article, damage to the image was still present.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
A. L. M. van den Bosch, M. D. T. de Jong, and W. J. L. Elving
Managing Corporate Visual Identity: Exploring the Differences Between Manufacturing and Service, and Profit-Making and Nonprofit Organizations
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2006; 43(2): 138 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
H. Hoeken and L. Ruikes
Art for Art's Sake?: An Exploratory Study of the Possibility to Align Works of Art With an Organization's Identity
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2005; 42(3): 233 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]