Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livesey, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 36, No. 1, 5-39 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369903600101
© 1999 Association for Business Communication

McDonald's and the Environmental Defense Fund: A Case Study of a Green Alliance

Sharon M. Livesey

Fordham University, New York City

Much green business literature, both academic and practitioner-oriented, views alliances between business and ecology groups as exemplifying a paradigm shift from command and control to a new kind of environmental practice, market environmentalism, and privileges the latter. This privileging occurs despite the claim made by the Environmental Defense Fund's (EDF) leader Fred Krupp, one of the early proponents of market environmentalism, that the new form supplements—rather than replaces-command and control. This paper, a case study, examines the public discourse of one such alliance between McDonald's and EDF. Rather than indicating a paradigm shift, the analysis shows that both partners drew, and had to draw, not only from the emerging discourse of market environmentalism, but also from the older, and purportedly displaced, paradigm of command and control. This rhetorical ambivalence is emblematic of a larger discursive struggle, namely, the contemporaneous socio-political conflict over how the ecological crisis was to be defined and what should constitute legitimate practice-by business, government and environmentalists-in its name. In my view, the McDonald's-EDF partnership was at once constrained by this discursive struggle over the environment and a constitutive element in the struggle itself.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
S. M. Livesey and K. Kearins
Transparent and Caring Corporations?: A Study of Sustainability Reports by the Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell
Organization Environment, September 1, 2002; 15(3): 233 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]