Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ober, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 36, No. 3, 280-296 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/002194369903600304
© 1999 Association for Business Communication

Telling It Like It Is: The Use of Certainty in Public Business Discourse

Scot Ober

Ball State University, Muncie, IN

Jensen J. Zhao

Ball State University, Muncie, IN

Rod Davis

Ball State University, Muncie, IN

Melody W. Alexander

Ball State University, Muncie, IN

How do large corporations use certainty in their public business communications? Do corporate profit status, industry type, or communication mode (oral versus written) affect their use of certainty? The "Management Discussion and Analysis" section of the 10-K reports of 72 Fortune 500 companies and corporate spokesper sons' recorded public oral business discourse were analyzed with a text-analysis software program (DICTION 4.0) to test the hypotheses. The results indicate that (a) corporate use of certainty in public business discourse is not affected by orga nizational profitability status or industry type; (b) a significant difference in the use of certainty exists between corporate oral and written communications; and (c) the use of certainty in corporate public business discourse does not differ signifi cantly from that in general discourse.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
R. Deumes
Corporate Risk Reporting: A Content Analysis of Narrative Risk Disclosures in Prospectuses
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 120 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
A. F. Herrmann
Stockholders in Cyberspace: Weick's Sensemaking Online
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2007; 44(1): 13 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
J. A. Rosa and J. Spanjol
Micro-Level Product-Market Dynamics: Shared Knowledge and Its Relationship to Market Development
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 2005; 33(2): 197 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
N. Zaidman
Cultural Codes and Languages Trategies in Business Communication: Interactions Between Israeli and Indian Businesspeople
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2001; 14(3): 408 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]