Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livesey, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38, No. 1, 58-91 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/002194360103800105
© 2001 Association for Business Communication

Eco-Identity as Discursive Struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria

Sharon M. Livesey

Fordham University, New York, NY

This paper addresses eco-discourse by the corporate rhetor that emerged in the wake of two environmental disputes. While such green business rhetoric might be conventionally viewed as a category of crisis communication, it is treated here as an instrument of corporate sensemaking and discursive struggle. Specifically, I analyze the "language games" between the Royal Dutch/Shell Group and its critics that arose over Shell UK's plans to decommission the Brent Spar and Shell Nige ria's operations in Ogoniland, a tribal community in the Niger Delta. I demon strate that Shell's rhetorical contests had constitutive effects on its environmental and human rights policies and practices and led to its cautious embrace of the language of sustainable development. Combining sensemaking and Foucauldian approaches, I argue that such local conflicts over meaning-making around the nat ural environment must be understood in terms of discursive struggle at the socio- political level where they both reflect and influence the dynamics of cultural and institutional change.

Key Words: Eco-Discourse • Green Rhetoric • Corporate Sensemaking • Discursive Struggle • Environmental & Human Rights


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Business SocietyHome page
B. Holzer
Turning Stakeseekers Into Stakeholders: A Political Coalition Perspective on the Politics of Stakeholder Influence
Business Society, March 1, 2008; 47(1): 50 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
M. B. Graham
Disciplinary Practice(s) in Business Communication, 1985 to 2004
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2006; 43(3): 268 - 277.
[PDF]


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
S. M. Livesey and K. Kearins
Transparent and Caring Corporations?: A Study of Sustainability Reports by the Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell
Organization Environment, September 1, 2002; 15(3): 233 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]