Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Business Communication
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coopman, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Democracy, Performance, and Outcomes in Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams

Stephanie J. Coopman

San Jose State University, CA

Central to hospice care is the interdisciplinary team. Such health care teams are by definition democratic, self-managing teams. Fifty-two team members on seven hospice teams in three hospice organizations participated in the study. Hospice team members perceived the teams to be not as democratic as might be expected. One dimension of team democracy, perceived involvement of all members in team decisions, was positively and significantly associated with perceived team cohesive ness, productiveness, satisfaction with the team, satisfaction with team communica tion, and desire to stay with the team. Perception of team productiveness was a mediating variable between team involvement and job satisfaction. This study adds to empirical research on teamwork and participation in organizations by identify ing the importance of a specific dimension of participation, involvement in deci sion making. The findings suggest the necessity of training team members in devel oping strategies to encourage involvement in decision making. However, practitioners are also cautioned against viewing involvement in team decision making as the answer to all teamwork ills.

Key Words: Teamwork • Democracy • Participation • Decision Making • Health Care

Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38, No. 3, 261-284 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/002194360103800305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. C. Strubler and K. M. York
An Exploratory Study of the Team Characteristics Model Using Organizational Teams
Small Group Research, December 1, 2007; 38(6): 670 - 695.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
G. R. Berry
Can Computer-Mediated Asynchronous Communication Improve Team Processes and Decision Making? Learning From the Management Literature
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 2006; 43(4): 344 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Turner, R. J. Thomas, and N. L. Reinsch Jr.
Willingness to Try a New Communication Technology: Perceptual Factors and Task Situations in a Health Care Context
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 5 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
D. R. Deeter-Schmelz and R. P. Ramsey
An Investigation of Team Information Processing in Service Teams: Exploring the Link between Teams and Customers
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, October 1, 2003; 31(4): 409 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]