Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frownfelter-Lohrke, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fulkerson, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38, No. 3, 337-357 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/002194360103800308

The Incidence and Quality of Graphics in Annual Reports: An International Comparison

Cynthia Frownfelter-Lohrke

Samford University, Birmingham, AL

Cheryl L. Fulkerson

University of Texas at San Antonio

Graphical presentation of financial and non-financial information represents a relatively low-cost means by which companies can enrich their annual reports. Graphics focus readers' attention. Further, graphics may facilitate understanding and enhance recall.

This study compares the relative incidence and measurement distortion of graphics contained in a matched sample of U.S. and non-U.S. companies listed on two major U.S. stock exchanges. A sample of 270 annual reports and 2,270 graphs from 12 countries was examined. While both U.S. and non-U.S. companies rely heavily on graphics, the annual reports of non-U.S. companies contain a sig nificantly higher number of graphics. Both groups fail to comply with many of the guidelines for good graphics as set forth in previous literature. Most notably, graph discrepancy indices (GDIs) reveal that both U.S. and non-U.S. companies present graphics that may be misleading to users. The incidence of graphic distor tion was higher for non-U.S. companies.

The findings are potentially important for policy development. At a minimum, they suggest that it may be appropriate to educate business professionals regarding graphics construction. On a broader level, they suggest that international standard setters concerned with uniformity of financial presentation, as well as U.S. regula tors concerned with investor protection, may consider the development and imple mentation of guidelines for graphical presentation of financial information.

Key Words: Annual Reports • Financial Reports • Graphics • Graph Discrepancy Index


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
R. Deumes
Corporate Risk Reporting: A Content Analysis of Narrative Risk Disclosures in Prospectuses
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 120 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. M. Penrose
Annual Report Graphic Use: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 158 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
V. Beattie, A. Dhanani, and M. J. Jones
Investigating Presentational Change in U.K. Annual Reports: A Longitudinal Perspective
Journal of Business Communication, April 1, 2008; 45(2): 181 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]