This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Richardson, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Gawdy Papers (1509-c. 1750) and the History of Professional Writing in England

Louisiana State Universtiy

Since the Gawdy Papers, a mostly unpublished collection of family papers in the British Library consisting of over five thousand docu ments, cover such a large period in the history of modern business writing (1509-c. 1750), they are extremely helpful in formulating ten tative theories about the history of business writing, a history which is at present largely blank. This article describes the collection and gives a brief history of the Gawdy family before examining some apparent trends in English business writing during the period, notably the gradual move from brief, formulaic, barebones documents to a more leisurely style and the increasing but problematic use of writing by women. Additionally, the article argues for a more comprehensive definition of "business" writing: first, before the nineteenth century most business was in modern terms agricultural rather than mercan tile, and second, in the small and inbred world of the middle and gentry classes many business letters combined private and public mat ters in ways unfamiliar in later business writing.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Johnson, O. Pimentel, and C. Pimentel Writing New Mexico White: A Critical Analysis of Early Representations of New Mexico in Technical Writing Journal of Business and Technical Communication, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 211 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]