Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dean, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 41, No. 2, 192-211 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0021943603261748

Consumer Reaction to Negative Publicity

Effects of Corporate Reputation, Response, and Responsibility for a Crisis Event

Dwane Hal Dean

East Carolina University, deand{at}mail.ecu.edu

Corporate crises often result in negative publicity, threatening the image of the company. The present study investigated the effects of company reputation for social responsibility prior to a crisis event, response to a crisis event, and responsibility for the event on overall consumer regard for the firm. The study is, in part, an experimental test of image restoration strategies conceptualized in the literature. Each of the three factors was found to exhibit a significant main effect. For the crisis scenario used in this study, responsibility explained the largest proportion of variance and response explained the least. An unexpected finding was that an inappropriate response by a "bad" company resulted in an increase in regard toward the firm, whereas the same response by a "good" company resulted in a decrease in regard for the firm.

Key Words: negative publicity • crisis communication • corporate image • fairness theory • attribution theory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sports EconomicsHome page
L. Brandes, E. Franck, and S. Nuesch
Local Heroes and Superstars: An Empirical Analysis of Star Attraction in German Soccer
Journal of Sports Economics, June 1, 2008; 9(3): 266 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. P. McHale, J. P. Zompetti, and M. A. Moffitt
A Hegemonic Model of Crisis Communication: Truthfulness and Repercussions for Free Speech in Kasky v. Nike
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 2007; 44(4): 374 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]