Journal of Business Communication

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hale, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hale, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 42, No. 2, 112-134 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0021943605274751
© 2005 Association for Business Communication

Crisis Response Communication Challenges

Building Theory From Qualitative Data

Joanne E. Hale

Ronald E. Dulek

University of Alabamardulek{at}cba.ua.edu

David P. Hale

The University of Alabama

This article reports results of a qualitative study that examined communication challenges decision makers experience during the response stage of crisis management. Response is perhaps the most critical of the three stages (prevention, response, recovery) identified in crisis research literature. Response is the point when crisis managers make decisions that may save lives and mitigate the effects of the crisis. Actions at this point also significantly influence public opinion about the crisis and an organization's handling of the event. This study provides additional insight into the complexities of the response stage through analysis of 26 interviews conducted with crisis decision makers involved in 15 organizational crises. Ten additional crises were analyzed through secondary data sources. The result of these analyses is the identification and explication of four crisis response steps: observation, interpretation, choice, and dissemination.

Key Words: crisis management • crisis response • crisis communication • case study


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
H. M. Hutchins and Jia Wang
Organizational Crisis Management and Human Resource Development: A Review of the Literature and Implications to HRD Research and Practice
Advances in Developing Human Resources, June 1, 2008; 10(3): 310 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. P. McHale, J. P. Zompetti, and M. A. Moffitt
A Hegemonic Model of Crisis Communication: Truthfulness and Repercussions for Free Speech in Kasky v. Nike
Journal of Business Communication, October 1, 2007; 44(4): 374 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
G. L. Genova
Crisis Communication Practices at an International Relief Agency
Business Communication Quarterly, September 1, 2006; 69(3): 329 - 337.
[PDF]