Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Journal of Business Communication
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smeltzer, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vance, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

conference

An Analysis of Graphic Use in Audio-graphic Teleconferences

Larry R. Smeltzer

Arizona State University

Charles M. Vance

Loyola Marymount University

This field study focused on the use of graphics during audio-graphics teleconferences. Variables measured were receivers' interest, perceived levels of comprehension and retention, as well as information clarity. Significant differences existed among telecon ferences which had no graphics, conferences in which the graphics did not directly complement the audio message, and those conferences in which the graphics directly complemented audio messages. A higher number of graphics complementing audio messages did not result in significant improvements. Individual differences were not an interacting effect. The perceived quality of the graphics was significantly related to the perceived effectiveness of the teleconference.

References

  • Allen, T.H. (1978). New method in social science research. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Anderson, J., Fralick, S.C., Hamilton, E., Tescher, A.G., & Widergren, R.D. (1984). Codec squeezes color teleconferencing through digital telephone lines. Electronics, 57, 113-115.
  • Barney, C. (1986). Is computer conferencing finally emerging as a tool? Electronics, 59, 41-43.
  • Benbasat, I. & Dexter, A.S. (March, 1986). An investigation of color and graphical information presented under varying time constraints. MIS Quarterly, 59-80.
  • Benbasat, I. & Schroeder, R. (March, 1977). An experimental investigation of some MIS design variables. MIS Quarterly, 37-49.
  • Birdwhistle, R.L. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Broadbent, D.E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
  • Bruner, J.S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review 64, 123-152.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Campeau, R.L. (1974). Selective review of the results of research on the use of audiovisual media to teach adults. AV Communication Review, 22(1), 5-39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Carterette, E.C. & Jones, M.H. (1967). Visual and auditory information processing in children and adults. Sciences, 156, 989-988.
  • Carver, M.E. (1941). Listening versus reading, In H. Cantrill & G. W. Allport , (Eds.), The psychology of radio (pp. 159-80). New York: Peter Smith.
  • Chronbach, L.J. & Snow, R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington Press, Inc.
  • Clark, R.E. (1983). Confounding in educational computing research . Journal of Educating Computing Research, 53, 129-40.
  • Clark, R.E. (1975). Constructing a taxonomy of media attributes for research purposes. AV Communication Review, 23, 197-215.
  • Cleveland, W.S. & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 531-554.[CrossRef]
  • Cushing, D. (January, 1983). Reach out and train somebody. Training, 14-20.
  • DeSanctis, G. (Fall 1984). Computer graphic as decision aids: directions for research. Decision Sciences, 15(4) 463-487.
  • Dickson, G.W., Leuheiser, R.L., Wetherbe, Nechis M. (1984). Key information systems issues for the 1980's . MIS Quarterly, 8(3) 136-160.
  • Dwyer, F.M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.
  • Elliott, F.R. (1936). Memory for visual-auditory material. Archives ofPsychology, 29, 199.
  • Fenche, M. (1987). In-house broadcasting: Anew way to cut costs. Administrative Management, 48, 38-44.
  • Freedman, R. & Stumpf, S. (1980). Learning style inventory: Less than meets the eye. Academy of Management Review, 5, 445-47.
  • Gagne, R.M. (1967). Instructional the conditions of learning. In L. Siegel, (Ed.), Instruction — some contemporary viewpoints. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, 291-313.
  • Garner, W.R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts . New York: John Wiley.
  • Gillette, P.E. (April 1985). Will teleconferencing improve education by reaching more participants? T.H.E. Journal, 78-80.
  • Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovering of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: The Free Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York : Anchor Books.
  • Goldstein, M.L. (1985). Your own CBS: Satellite video isn't videoconferencing . Industry Week, 225, 32-33.
  • Gritzmacher, K. (Autumn1987). Visual control tools: A hidden productivity factor. National Productivity Review, 314-323.
  • Hansell, J.K. & Green, D. (1984). Videoconferencing. Business Horizons , 27, 57-61.
  • Hartman, F.R. (1961). Single and multiple channel communication: A review of research and a proposed model. AV Communication Review , 235-262.
  • Hollingsworth, H.L. (1935). Psychology of the audience. New York: American Book.
  • Hsia, H.J. (1968). Effects of noise and difficulty levels of input information in auditory, visual, and audiovisual information processing. Journal of Communication, 18, 325-353.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hsia, H.J. (1968). Output, error, equivocation, and recalled information in auditory, visual, and audiovisual information processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 99-106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hsia, H.J. (1971). The information processing capacity of modality and channel performance. AV Communication Review, 19, 51-75.
  • Hsia, H.J. (1977). Redundancy: Is it the lost key to better communication ? AV Communication Review, 25, 63-85.
  • Ives, B. (December 1982). Graphical user interfaces for business information systems. MIS Quarterly/Special Issue, 15-42.
  • Johansen, R. & Bullen, C. (1984). What to expect from teleconferencing. Harvard Business Review, 62, 164-170.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Katz, P.A. & Deutsch, M. (1963). Visual and auditory efficiency and its relationship to reading in children. Final Report, Project 1099, Washington, DC: Cooperative Research Program, Office of Education .
  • Keller, J.M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: Atheoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 26-34.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1974). On management and the learning process. In D. A. Kolb, I. M. Rubin, & J. M. McIntyre (Eds.), Organizational Psychology: A Book of Readings. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kosslyn, S.M. (September, 1985). Graphics and human information processing . Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 499-512.[CrossRef]
  • Kuzela, L. (1986). Call me on the TV: Videconferencing spreads to smaller firms. Industry Week, 228, 66.
  • Kuzela, L. (1985). Zooming in on decisions. Industry Week, 226, 46-48.
  • Kruskal, W.H. (1982). Criteria for judging statistical graphics. Utilitas Mathematica, Series B, Number 21B, 283-310.
  • Lee, J.M., MacLachlan, J., & Wallace, W. (September 1986). The effects of 3D imagery on managerial data interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 257-269.
  • Levie, W.H. & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research . ECJT, 30(4) 195-232.
  • MacDonald-Ross, W. (1977). How numbers are shown: A review of research on presentation of quantitative data in text. AV Communications Review, 25, 359-409.
  • Main, R.E. & Griffiths, B. (1977). Evaluation of audio and pictorial instructional supplements. AV Communications Review, 25(2) 167-179.
  • McGeoch, J.A. (1942). The psychology of human learning. New York: Longman, Green.
  • Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin , 71, 365.
  • Miles, M.B. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590-601.[CrossRef]
  • Newport, J.P., Jr. (1985). Picture phones: New spin on an old idea. Fortune, 112, 63.
  • Ott, J. ( 1985). Videoconference use expands to meet rising business needs . Aviation Week, 123, 157-161.
  • Penrose, J.M. (Winter 1984). Telecommunications, teleconferencing, and business communications. The Journal of Business Communication , 21(1), 93-113.
  • Peterson, B.K. (Spring 1983). Tables and graphs improve reader performance and reader reaction. The Journal of Business Communication , 20(2), 47-55.
  • Pintrich, P.R., Cross, D.R., Kozman, R.B., & McKeachie, W.F. (1986). Instructional psychology . Annual review of psychology (pp. 611-651). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
  • Playfair, W. (1786). The commercial and political atlas. London: London Press.
  • Raynor, J.D. (1974). Relationships between achievement-oriented motives, future orientation, and academic performance. In A. Atkinson and C. Raynod, (Eds.), Motivation and Achievement. Washington, DC: Winston.
  • Rosetti, D.K. & Surynt, T.J. (Fall 1985). Videoteleconferencing & performance. The Journal of Business Communication, 22(4), 25-31.
  • Rychlak, J.M. (1977). The psychology of rigorous humanism. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Smeltzer, L. (Fall 1986). Receivers'reactions to electronic communication . The Journal of Business Communication, 23(4) 37-54.
  • Stroud, J.B. (1946). Psychology in education. New York: Longman, Green.
  • Stumpf, S.A. & Freedman, R.D. (1981). The learning style inventory: Still less than meets the eye. Academy of Management Review , 6, 297-99.[CrossRef]
  • Travers, R. (1964). The transmission of information to human receivers . A Communication Review, 12, 373-385.
  • Tyler, M. (1984). Running out of steam: Both users and vendors fear that the teleconferencing industry may simply disappear. Datamation, 30, 57-58.
  • Vogel, D. (January 23, 1986). Digital duo boosts flexibility and function of telephone lines. Electronic Design, 34, 115.
  • Vogel, D., Dickson, G.W., & Lehman, J.A. (1988). Persuasion and the role of visual presentation support: The UM/3M study. Paper presented at the annual Academy of Management Conference, Los Angeles.
  • Wainer, H. & Thissen, D. (1981). Graphical data analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 191-241.[CrossRef]
  • Wexley, K.N. (1984). Personnel training. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter, (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (pp.519-51). Palo Alto, CA : Annual Reviews, Inc.

Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 26, No. 2, 123-141 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/002194368902600203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
D. Liu and L. Beamer
Multimedia as a Teaching Tool in Business Communication Course Delivery
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1997; 60(2): 51 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business and Technical CommunicationHome page
N. L. REINSCH JR. and R. W. BESWICK
Preferences for Sending Word-Processed versus Handwritten Messages: An Exploratory Study
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, January 1, 1995; 9(1): 42 - 62.
[Abstract]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
M. L. Bayless and L. D. Clark
Integrating Business Computer Graphics in the Communication Curriculum
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 55(4): 31 - 33.
[PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
A. Williams and D. Ross
The Status of Business Communication and Technology: A Bibliography
Business Communication Quarterly, January 1, 1992; 55(4): 45 - 47.
[PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
N. L. Reinsch Jr., C. M. Steele, P. V. Lewis, M. Stano, and R. W. Beswick
Measuring Telephone Apprehension
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1990; 4(2): 198 - 221.
[Abstract]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smeltzer, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vance, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?