This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lowry, P. B. Articles by Lowry, M. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Building a Taxonomy and Nomenclature of Collaborative Writing to Improve Interdisciplinary Research and Practice

Brigham Young University, pbl{at}email.byu.edu

Aaron Curtis

Brigham Young University

Michelle René Lowry

Brigham Young University

This article provides a taxonomy of, nomenclature for, and discussion of issues related to collaborative writing. The goal is to enhance its research, improve its application in academia and industry, and help produce technologies that better support collaborative writing. To write collaboratively and build supportive technologies, practitioners and academics need to use a consistent nomenclature and taxonomy of collaborative writing. This article defines key collaborative writing terms and builds a taxonomy, including collaborative writing activities, strategies, control modes, work modes, and roles. This article stresses that effective choices in group awareness, participation, and coordination are critical to successful collaborative writing outcomes, and that these outcomes may be promoted through collaborative writing software, chat software, face-to-face meetings, and group processes.

Key Words: collaborative writing • taxonomy • collaboration • group awareness • collaborative writing software

References

• Adkins, M., Reinig, J. Q., Kruse, J., & Mittleman, D. (1999). GSS collaboration in document development: Using Group Writer to improve the process. Paper presented at the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
• Allen, N. J., Atkinson, D., Morgan, M., Moore, T., & Snow, C. (1987). What experienced collaborators say about collaborative writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 1(2), 70-90.
• Anderson, P. V. (Ed.).(1985). What survey research tells us about writing at work. New York: Guilford.
• Anderson, P. V. (1989). Business communication: An audience-centered approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
• Baecker, R., Glass, G., Mitchell, A., & Posner, I. (1994). SASSE: The collaborative editor. Companion Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems CHI ’94.
• Baecker, R. M., Nastos, D., Posner, I. R., & Mawby, K. L. (1993, April 24-29). The user-centered iterative design of collaborative writing software. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
• Barbour, D. H. (1990). Collaborative writing in the business writing classroom: An ethical dilemma for the teacher. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(3), 33-35.
• Beard, J. D., Rymer, J., & Williams, D. L. (1989). An assessment system for collaborative-writing Groups: Theory and empirical evaluation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3, 29-51.[Abstract]
• Beck, E. (Ed.). (1993). A survey of experiences of collaborative writing. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
• Beck, E., & Bellotti, V. M. (1993). Informed opportunism as strategy: Supporting coordination in distributed collaborative writing. Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy.
• Belanger, K., & Greer, J. (1992). Beyond the group project: A blueprint for a collaborative writing course. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(1), 99-115.[Abstract]
• Blicq, R. (1998). Collaborative editing at a distance. Paper presented at the Professional Communication Conference (IPCC).
• Bogert, J., & Butt, D. (1990). Opportunities lost, challenges met: Understanding and applying group dynamics in writing projects. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53, 51-58.
• Bosley, D. (1989). A national study of the uses of collaborative writing in business communications courses among members of the ABC. Unpublished dissertation, Illinois State University.
• Bosley, D. S., Morgan, M., & Allen, N. (1990). An essential bibliography on collaborative writing. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 27-33.
• Bovee, C. L., & Thill, J. V. (1989). Business communication today (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
• Bruffee, K. A. (1987). Writing and reading as collaborative or social acts. In T. Enos (Ed.), A sourcebook for basic writing teachers (pp. 565-574). New York: Random House.
• Burnett, R. E. (1990). Benefits of collaborative planning in the business communication classroom. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53, 9-17.
• Clifford, J. (1981). Composing in stages: The effects of a collaborative pedagogy. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 37-53.
• Couture, B., & Rymer, J. (Eds.). (1989). Interactive writing on the job: Definitions and implications of collaboration. Urbana, IL: NCTE and ABC.
• Cross, G. A. (1993). The interrelation of genre, context, and process in the collaborative writing of two corporate documents. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 141-152). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
• Cross, G. A. (1994). Collaboration and conflict: A contextual exploration of group writing and positive emphasis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
• Cross, G. A. (1998). Collective form: An exploration of large-group writing. Journal of Business Communication, 37(1), 77-100.
• Cross, G. A. (2001). Forming the collective mind: A contextual exploration of large-scale collaborative writing in industry. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
• Delisle, N. M., & Schwartz, M. D. (1989). Collaborative writing with hypertext. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(3), 183-188.[CrossRef]
• DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589-609.
• Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
• Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (INTERCHI ’92), New York.
• Dubs, S., & Hayne, S. C. (1992, November 1-4). Distributed facilitation: A concept whose time has come? Paper presented at the Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1992, Toronto, Canada.
• DuFrene, D. D., & Nelson, B. H. (1990). Effective co-authoring for business communication academicians. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53, 68-71.
• Duin, A. H. (1990). Terms and tools: A theory and research-based approach to collaborative writing. Bulletin of the Association for Business Computing, 53(2), 45-50.
• Duin, A. H. (1991). Computer-supported collaborative writing: The workplace & the writing classroom. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5(2), 123-150.[Abstract]
• Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
• Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 39-58.
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.[CrossRef]
• Forman, J. (Ed.). (1989). The discourse communities and group writing practice of management students. New York: Random House.
• Forman, J. (1991). Novices work on group reports: Problems in group writing and computer-supported group writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5(1), 48-75.[Abstract]
• Forman, J., & Katsky, P. (1986, Fall). The group report: A problem in small group or writing processes? Journal of Business Communication, 23, 23-35.
• Forman, J., & Kelly, K. (1990). The Random House guide to business writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Fuchs, L., Pankoke-Babatz, U., & Prinz, W. (1995, September). Supporting cooperative awareness with local event mechanisms: The groupdesk system. Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
• Galegher, J., & Kraut, R. E. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: An experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 110-138.[CrossRef]
• Gere, A. R. (1987). Writing groups: History, theory, implications. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
• Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C., & Cockburn, A. (1996). Using distortion-oriented displays to support workspace awareness (Technical report). Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary.
• Higuchi, M., & Takahashi, K. (1995). World-wide collaborative writing: A case study. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific World Wide Web Conference and Exhibition.
• Horton, M., Rogers, P., Austin, L., & McCormick, M. (1991). Exploring the impact of face-to-face collaborative technology on group writing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(3), 27-48.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1987). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kaye, A. R. (Ed.). (1993). Computer networking for development of distance education courses. London: Springer-Verlag.
• Kirby, A., & Rodden, T. (1995). Contact: Support for distributed cooperative writing. Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, the Netherlands.
• Kraut, R. E., Galegher, J., & Egido, C. (1988). Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 31-58.
• Kreth, M. L. (2000). A survey of the co-op writing experiences of recent engineering graduates. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(2), 137-151.
• Lay, M., & Karis, W. (1991). Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
• Lay, M. M. (1989). Interpersonal conflict in collaborative writing: What we can learn from gender studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3, 5-28.[Abstract]
• LeFevre, K. B. (1987). Invention as a social act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
• Locker, K. O. (1989). Business and administrative communication. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
• Locker, K. O. (1992). What makes a collaborative writing team successful? A case study of lawyers and social workers in a state agency. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
• Loehr, L. (1995). Composing in groups: The concept of authority in cross functional project team work. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38(2), 83-94.[CrossRef]
• Lowry, P. B. (2002a, August). Research on process structure for distributed, asynchronous collaborative writing groups. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Dallas, TX.
• Lowry, P. B. (2002b, August). Research on proximity choices for distributed, asynchronous collaborative writing groups. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Dallas, TX.
• Lowry, P. B., Albrecht, C. C., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Lee, J. D. (2002). Evolutionary development and research on Internet-based collaborative writing tools and processes to enhance eWriting in an eGovernment setting. Decision Support Systems (DSS), 34(3), 229-252.
• Lowry, P. B., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (2002). Using the thinkLet framework to improve distributed collaborative writing. Paper presented at the Thirty-Fifth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kona.
• Lowry, P. B., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (2003). Using Internet-based, distributed collaborative writing tools to improve coordination and group awareness in writing teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(4).
• Mabrito, M. (1992). Real-time computer network collaboration: Case studies of business writing students. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(3), 316-336.[Abstract]
• Mathes, J. C. (1989). Written communication: The industrial context. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work. New York: Random House.
• McIsaac, C. M., & Aschauer, M. A. (1990). Proposal writing at Atherton Jordan, Inc. Management Communication Quarterly, 3, 527-560.[Abstract]
• Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S., Chandhok, R., & Morris, J. H. (1990, October 7-10). Issues in the design of computer-support for co-authoring and commenting. Paper presented at the Third Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’90), Los Angeles.
• Newman, J., & Newman, R. (1992). Three modes of collaborative authoring. In P. L. Holt & N. Williams (Eds.), Computers and writing: State of the art (pp. 17-24). Oxford, UK: Intellect Books.
• Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R., & Balthazard, P. A. (1997). Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(3), 163-207.
• Odell, L. (1985). Beyond the text: Relations between writing and social context. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 249-280). New York: Guilford.
• O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Rocklin, T., Lambiotte, J. G., Hythecker, V. I., & Larsen, C. O. (1985). Cooperative writing: Direct effects and transfer. Written Communication, 2, 307-315.[Abstract]
• Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrosten, M., & Carter, M. (1993). Groupwork close-up—A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple-group editor. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(4), 321-348.[CrossRef]
• Porter, J. E. (1990). Ideology and collaboration in the classroom and in the corporation. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53, 18-22.
• Posner, I. R., & Baecker, R. M. (1992). How people write together. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai.
• Rada, R., & Wang, W. (1998). Computer-supported collaborative writing phases. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 26(2), 137-149.
• Rice, R. P., & Huguley, J. T., Jr. (1994). Describing collaborative forms: A profile of the team-writing process. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37(3), 163-170.
• Rimmershaw, R. (1992). Collaborative writing practices and writing support technologies. Instructional Science, 21(1-3), 15-28.
• Schlichter, J., Koch, M., & Burger, M. (1997). Workspace awareness for distributed teams. In W. Conen (Ed.), Lecture notes on computer science (pp. 199-219). Munchen, Germany: Springer.
• Sharples, M. (1992). Representing writing: External representations and the writing process. In P. Holt & N. Williams (Eds.), Computers and writing: State of the art. Oxford, UK: Intellect; Kluwer Academic.
• Sharples, M. (1993). Adding a little structure to collaborative writing. London: Springer-Verlag.
• Sharples, M., Goodlet, J., Beck, E., Wood, C., Plowman, L., & Evans, W. (1993). Research issues in the study of computer supported collaborative writing. In M. Sharples (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative writing (pp. 9-28). London: Springer-Verlag.
• Smart, G. (1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank’s response to its executives’ expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
• Stratton, C. R. (1989). Collaborative writing in the workplace. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(3), 178-182.[CrossRef]
• Tammaro, S. G., Moseir, J. N., Goodwin, N. C., & Spitz, G. (1997). Collaborative writing is hard to support: A field study of collaborative writing. Computer supported cooperative work. Journal of Collaborative Computing, 6, 19-51.
• Thralls, C. (1992). Bakhtin, collaborative partners, and published discourse: A collaborative view of composing. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
• Trimbur, J. (1985). Collaborative learning and teaching writing. In B. W. McClelland & T. R. Donovan (Eds.), Perspectives on research and scholarship in composition (pp. 87-109). New York: Modern Language Association.
• Wilds, N. G. (1989). Writing in the military: A different mission. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work. New York: Random House.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Jones From Writers to Information Coordinators: Technology and the Changing Face of Collaboration Journal of Business and Technical Communication, October 1, 2005; 19(4): 449 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Forman and M. L. Markus Research on Collaboration, Business Communication, and Technology: Reflections on an Interdisciplinary Academic Collaboration Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2005; 42(1): 78 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Forman Opening the Aperture: Research and Theory on Collaborative Writing Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 27 - 36. [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lowry, P. B. Articles by Lowry, M. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?